We’ve just started Week 2 of the Storyboarding OOC, so it’s time for the first progress report.
What we did in Week 1
Around 114 people signed up as registered participants, of whom over 30 have been participating actively. The discussion forums for Week 1 included conversation around many very real and challenging problems to be avoided in the activity called ‘Ruining a course’; some in-depth reflection on the concepts of ‘learning design’ vs ‘instructional design’, Salmon’s five-stage model and Anderson’s interaction equivalency theorem; and some very interesting descriptions of the courses that participants are planning to storyboard.
A diverse group
People on the OOC are participating from six continents (just missing that elusive participant from Antarctica to complete the map!) Many participants have a long history of designing courses in higher education or professional development contexts, while some are taking on this role for the first time. Some are old hands at online learning and teaching, while for others this is their first experience of an online course of any description. This wide range of backgrounds, skills and experiences is to be expected on an open course. I’m aware that it could make the experience of the course difficult for some participants, but I have been heartened to see the way participants are reaching out to one another across all the different kinds of boundaries that might create barriers, asking questions to better understand each other’s contexts and challenges, and providing encouraging feedback on each other’s posts.
The decision to create ‘groups’ for discussion forum activities
At the start of the OOC I mentioned that we were planning to divide participants into two groups for the discussion forum activities – learners were asked to join either the A-M group or the N-Z group, according to their user names. All forums were open to all participants, and anyone was free to switch groups or to participate in both if they wanted to. The rationale for this approach was to avoid having overwhelming discussion forums, while also giving participants choice and flexibility in how they participated. As it turned out, the approach worked very well, but the A-M forums had about twice to three times as many participants as the N-Z forums. This seemed a bit unfair on the people in the smaller group, and so we have decided to merge the discussion forum groups into one for Week 2. Watch this space for an update on how this new strategy goes…
What’s on the menu for Week 2
This week we are experimenting with storyboarding tools/platforms:
- Traditional flipcharts, sticky notes and marker pens
- Google Sheets
- Other tools selected by participants (e.g. Prezi, Gliffy, Freemind etc.)
By the end of the week the aim is that everyone should have selected their preferred tool, and shared the rationale for that choice with others on the OOC – or on the Web for those participants who blog and/or tweet. (Watch out for #sldooc on Twitter.)
New resources available
For Week 2 we have created a few new resources (all available as OERs):
- Video: Storyboarding the Storyboarding OOC using Linoit (view it on Linoit here)
- Video: Storyboarding a course on ‘Online Academic Identity’ using Popplet (view it on Popplet here)
- Week 2 course materials (Google Doc)
If you’re interested in joining in, it’s not too late – you can still enrol or view the course on CourseSites!